
As election day is nearing and the last debate is over, many websites and organizations are tracking voter's reactions and thoughts through polling. Looking at the presidential election I reasearched both the Gallup Poll and the C-SPAN poll.
-The Gallup Poll conducted from 10/03 to 10/05 and polled a sample of 2744 registered
voters. The margin of error was plus or minus 3 points. The poll revealed Obama winning
with a 50% and McCain trailing with a 42%.
-The C-SPAN Poll was conducted from 10/05 to 10/07 and polled a sample of 1220 likely
voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 points as well. Again, it showed Obama
leading with a 47% and McCain slightly behind with a 45%.
Looking now at a more local race, the VA Senate race is also heating up between Warner and Gilmore. So far, for most of the polls I looked at I seems to be a sweep away by the Democratic candidate, Warner. Let's take a closer look by analyzing two polls, the Rasmussen and the Washington Post polls.
-The Rasmussen Poll, conducted on 9/25, polled 700 likely voters and showed Warner
winning with 60 points and Gilmore behind him with 34 points.
-The Washington Post Poll, conducted from 9/18 to 9/21, polled 698 likely voters and also
showed Warner holding a significant lead over Gilmore. (61:31)
Most polling data was comparable and, to some extent, showed most of the same results. Since most polls are very similar, it comes down to which sources are more accurate. Today, polling helps political candidates to see what the American people prefer; policymakers can keep in touch with changing opinions on issues. Polls can easily impact a campaign, too. Often they can create a bandwagon effect where voters only support a candidate because they see so many others are. It's kind of like peer pressure in a way. Also, exit polls are inaccurate in their findings because it is not a random sample and the findings are stated way too soon on election day considering our different time zones. Polls are only effective and accurate in gauging public opinion if they are conducted with a good numbered sample (around 1000-1500 people to be polled), a random sample (everyone should have an equal probability of being selected to be polled), and there is a decent sampling error (level of confidence in the finding of a public opinion poll). Most of the polls have small samples of less than 1000 people so in that case they would not be that accurate, but it is a good thing that the poeple sample are likely or registered voters.
***wow this is the longest post i've written...haha***
-The Gallup Poll conducted from 10/03 to 10/05 and polled a sample of 2744 registered
voters. The margin of error was plus or minus 3 points. The poll revealed Obama winning
with a 50% and McCain trailing with a 42%.
-The C-SPAN Poll was conducted from 10/05 to 10/07 and polled a sample of 1220 likely
voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 points as well. Again, it showed Obama
leading with a 47% and McCain slightly behind with a 45%.
Looking now at a more local race, the VA Senate race is also heating up between Warner and Gilmore. So far, for most of the polls I looked at I seems to be a sweep away by the Democratic candidate, Warner. Let's take a closer look by analyzing two polls, the Rasmussen and the Washington Post polls.
-The Rasmussen Poll, conducted on 9/25, polled 700 likely voters and showed Warner
winning with 60 points and Gilmore behind him with 34 points.
-The Washington Post Poll, conducted from 9/18 to 9/21, polled 698 likely voters and also
showed Warner holding a significant lead over Gilmore. (61:31)
Most polling data was comparable and, to some extent, showed most of the same results. Since most polls are very similar, it comes down to which sources are more accurate. Today, polling helps political candidates to see what the American people prefer; policymakers can keep in touch with changing opinions on issues. Polls can easily impact a campaign, too. Often they can create a bandwagon effect where voters only support a candidate because they see so many others are. It's kind of like peer pressure in a way. Also, exit polls are inaccurate in their findings because it is not a random sample and the findings are stated way too soon on election day considering our different time zones. Polls are only effective and accurate in gauging public opinion if they are conducted with a good numbered sample (around 1000-1500 people to be polled), a random sample (everyone should have an equal probability of being selected to be polled), and there is a decent sampling error (level of confidence in the finding of a public opinion poll). Most of the polls have small samples of less than 1000 people so in that case they would not be that accurate, but it is a good thing that the poeple sample are likely or registered voters.
***wow this is the longest post i've written...haha***

